I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was building extra pressure and was slower as opposed to aged things. I do not remember if I even tried using normal h4831 or not; I'm thinking not.

They are precisely the same thing, but H4831 sc is Lower shorter so it's going to pack into a scenario simpler then the traditional, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it lets us to add more powder then just the conventional H4831.

The point that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you're seeing higher velocities attained with that powder, versus Anything you've viewed Along with the IMR things. Also superior powder, but rather superior suited to a bit smaller sized instances by using a bit less ability.

Warning using SC or SSC designed loads with long Minimize, back again off and work up. Use Protected loading procedures.

The only big difference as I know it is that the SC was built to do the job via powder measures greater (which it does). The lengthier grains usually do not feed nicely at all in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:

I have used H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without variance. The one thing could be the small Slash provides a little bit more House. Fantastic luck!gun)

I don't like to work up a load making use of a person great deal of powder after which you can have to work up once again for the reason that I run out and have to start out using a new whole lot selection.

In fact, It truly is even a good idea to back down and work up properly after you go from a person ton to another h4831sc great deal of the same powder.

At present applying IMR 4831 in a very 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Apart from it being shorter Slice, precisely what is the difference in both of these powders, and will I swap to H4831sc?

locutus reported: I still have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows by means of my powder actions efficiently.

Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're completely distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 staying h4831 vs h4831sc considerably quicker than the Hodgdon variants. You should not handle them as the identical powder, since they most absolutely usually are not.

This can be an Extraordinary extruded h4831sc propellant and delivers heightened insensitivity to cold and warm temperatures.

I realize the H4831SC provides a greater load density But I think I've ample area in my situation for the normal H4831.

The reality that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you are looking at higher velocities acquired with that powder, versus what you've witnessed While using the IMR stuff.